Skip navigation
Vista previa
Ver
830,57 kB

Compartir:

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor
dc.contributor.authorArce, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorCampa, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGavilán, Ángel
dc.coverage.spatialPaíses de la OCDE
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-10T17:53:13Z
dc.date.available2019-08-10T17:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-17
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 0213-2710 (en papel)
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 1579-8666 (en línea)
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.bde.es/handle/123456789/6966
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies how investment and production in an economy is allocated across sectors when they face asymmetric financial conditions. Namely, when investors in one sector may run projects with higher loan-to-values than in another sector. Investors decide where to invest based on total rents and face a trade-off. While they may run larger projects in the sector with the best financial conditions, unit rents in this sector are lower than in the other sector due to a pledgeability premium. The level of interest rates affects this trade-off and therefore investors' endogenous segmentation across sectors. The effect is non-monotonic. When interest rates are high, projects are small and the differences in unit rents across sectors dominate the differences in project sizes. In this case, a drop in interest rates, move investors toward the most productive sector. Instead, when interest rates are low, projects are large, but much larger in the sector with the best financial conditions. In this case, the differences in project sizes across sectors dominate the differences in unit rents and a drop in interest rates moves investors towards the least productive sector but with the best access to external funding. We find that this hump-shaped relationship between interest rates and the share of investors allocated to a given sector may translate into a similar hump-shaped relationship between interest rates and the ratio of aggregate investment across sectors. Instead, in a model without financial asymmetries across sectors both relationships are monotonic and do not exhibit a hump. We claim that this paper provides helpful insights to understand the pattern of sectoral reallocation of investment and production observed in some OECD countries recently
dc.format.extent36 p. : gráf.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBanco de España
dc.relation.ispartofDocumentos de Trabajo / Banco de España, 0837
dc.rightsReconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.rightsIn Copyright - Non Commercial Use Permitted
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/
dc.subjectInvestment and credit
dc.subjectPledgeability premium
dc.subjectCollateral constraints
dc.subjectSectoral allocation
dc.subjectHousing
dc.titleAsymmetric collateral requirements and output composition
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo
dc.identifier.bdebib000221157
dc.identifier.bdepubDTRA-200837-eng
dc.subject.bdeFluctuaciones y ciclos económicos
dc.subject.bdeMacroeconomía y economía monetaria
dc.subject.bdeRenta, empleo y precios
dc.publisher.bdeMadrid : Banco de España, 2008
dc.subject.jelE22
dc.subject.jelE32
dc.subject.jelE44
Aparece en las colecciones:


loading