Skip navigation
Vista previa
Ver
475,15 kB
Compartir:
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor
dc.contributor.authorAlberola, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorSerena Garralda, José Mª
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-10T17:53:14Z
dc.date.available2019-08-10T17:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-02
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 0213-2710 (en papel)
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 1579-8666 (en línea)
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.bde.es/handle/123456789/6967
dc.description.abstractSovereign external assets (SEAs) comprise foreign exchange reserves and sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). The global stock of reserves reached 7 $trn in the second quarter of 2008, but data on SWF are rather elusive. Our estimation puts the SWFs at around 2,5 $trn dollars by 2007 and in the last years they have grown at a high pace, fostered by high commodity prices. Therefore, SEAs have surpassed the 10 $trn mark (around 5% of global assets and 15% of global GDP). This paper argues that reserves and SWF assets should be jointly considered for the assessment of global imbalances. Both are official capital outflows from developing to developed countries, both hinder internal adjustment in current account surplus countries, both help to cover the financing needs of deficit countries, in particular in the US, and, therefore, both contribute to sustain global imbalances. The importance of SEAs in financing the external imbalances of the US has been widely recognised but scantly measured. Our rule-of-thumb calculations suggests that they have greatly increased their importance in the last years, having surpassed the US$ trillion increase in 2007
dc.description.abstractrelative to US financing needs, this amount represents around a 135% and 50% of net and gross needs, respectively, in 2007. Reserves have in the last years contributed 80% and SWFs 20%.Looking ahead, two main conclusions can be put forward: 1) the relative importance SWFs in the financing of the US deficits and global imbalances is set to increase (also relative to reserves), but this is conditional to commodity prices remaining at high levels. On the one hand, the economic motivation of SWFs -intertemporal smoothing- is more palatable than that of reserves (exchange rate management), despite political concerns on SWFs
dc.description.abstracton the other hand, SWFs do not have significant internal costs, contrary to reserves, whose monetary and fiscal costs are increasing in the margin..
dc.format.extent33 p. : tab., gráf.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBanco de España
dc.relation.ispartofDocumentos de Trabajo / Banco de España, 0834
dc.rightsReconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.rightsIn Copyright - Non Commercial Use Permitted
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/
dc.subjectInternational reserves
dc.subjectSovereign wealth funds
dc.subjectGlobal imbalances
dc.subjectExchange rates
dc.titleSovereign external assets and the resilience of global imbalances
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo
dc.identifier.bdebib000221158
dc.identifier.bdepubDTRA-200834-eng
dc.subject.bdePolítica monetaria
dc.subject.bdeBancos centrales y otras autoridades monetarias
dc.subject.bdeMovimientos de capital a largo plazo
dc.publisher.bdeMadrid : Banco de España, 2008
dc.subject.jelE58
dc.subject.jelF21
dc.subject.jelF36
dc.subject.jelG15
Aparece en las colecciones:


loading